A U.S. senator is asking the FAA to clarify how counterdrone testing would work on the state and native degree.
Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Edward Markey, a rating member of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Safety, this month despatched a letter to the FAA on the heels of a listening to within the Safety Subcommittee. The listening to reportedly explored the “security challenges of unmanned aerial methods,” based on a press launch. “Throughout this listening to, a consultant of the FAA maintained that present federal legislation prevents state and native authorities from testing counter-drone know-how, in addition to some essential detection instruments,” the assertion famous.
Markey particularly expressed issues about alleged airport sighting of drones in years previous – a lot of which turned out to not be drones in any respect.
“The FAA’s place on counter-UAS testing is regarding as a result of state and native authorities are actually on the front-lines of drone safety and have an integral position to play in defending towards threats posed by this rising know-how,” Markey wrote within the letter to FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson.
“Consequently, state and native authorities should be capable of take a look at counter-UAS know-how alongside the FAA or we are going to doubtless face delays within the know-how’s implementation, thus stopping public security officers from with the ability to higher defend their communities.”
Markey requested 4 questions within the letter:
“Within the FAA’s view, how do varied federal legal guidelines probably battle with state and native authority to check drone detection and mitigation applied sciences in coordination with the FAA?
Does the FAA consider that statutory adjustments are wanted to allow counter-drone know-how testing by state and native authorities, or can it make such adjustments by means of the regulatory course of?
If the FAA has the regulatory authority to allow counter-drone testing, will it make these adjustments?
Does the FAA plan to check state and native legislation enforcement’s time, place, and method limitations on drones?”
Final 12 months, the Blue Ribbon Activity Power, a joint effort between AUVSI and Airports Council Worldwide revealed a report on drone mitigation and airports. The report said:
“The BRTF takes the place that airports shouldn’t be burdened with enterprise this operation alone. As an alternative, as with many different operations at airports, resembling airport safety, UAS detection ought to be a shared accountability between airports and federal governments.”
Jason is a longstanding contributor to DroneLife with an avid curiosity in all issues tech. He focuses on anti-drone applied sciences and the general public security sector; police, hearth, and search and rescue.
Starting his profession as a journalist in 1996, Jason has since written and edited 1000’s of participating information articles, weblog posts, press releases and on-line content material.
E mail Jason
Subscribe to DroneLife right here.